<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fall of Roman Empire Film on Ancient Rome</title>
    <link>https://ancientrome.org/tags/fall-of-roman-empire-film/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Fall of Roman Empire Film on Ancient Rome</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ancientrome.org/tags/fall-of-roman-empire-film/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Fall of the Roman Empire (1964): The Film Nobody Saw</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/the-fall-of-the-roman-empire-1964-the-film-nobody-saw/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/the-fall-of-the-roman-empire-1964-the-film-nobody-saw/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Anthony Mann&amp;rsquo;s The Fall of the Roman Empire was released in 1964, ran for nearly three hours, cost twenty million dollars, and was such a catastrophic commercial failure that it effectively ended the sword-and-sandal epic as a Hollywood genre for a generation. It also happens to be a substantially better film than its reputation suggests, more historically serious than most of its contemporaries, and in certain respects a more honest engagement with the period it depicts than the celebrated Gladiator that covered similar ground thirty-six years later.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
