<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Hbo Rome on Ancient Rome</title>
    <link>https://ancientrome.org/tags/hbo-rome/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Hbo Rome on Ancient Rome</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ancientrome.org/tags/hbo-rome/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Rome on Screen: What Hollywood Gets Right and Wrong</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/rome-on-screen-what-hollywood-gets-right-and-wrong/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/rome-on-screen-what-hollywood-gets-right-and-wrong/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Rome has been a film subject since the beginning of cinema, and the relationship between Hollywood&amp;rsquo;s Rome and the historical record is complicated in ways that go beyond simple error-counting. Some of what cinema gets wrong is deliberate simplification for narrative clarity. Some is period convention — the sandal epics of the 1950s reflected Cold War anxieties as much as ancient history. Some is genuine incomprehension of a world sufficiently distant that even educated filmmakers cannot feel its difference. And occasionally, something unexpected gets it exactly right in ways that the filmmakers may not have consciously intended.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
