<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Legacy on Ancient Rome</title>
    <link>https://ancientrome.org/tags/legacy/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Legacy on Ancient Rome</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ancientrome.org/tags/legacy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Charlemagne and the Rome That Never Died</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/charlemagne-and-the-rome-that-never-died/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/charlemagne-and-the-rome-that-never-died/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;On Christmas Day, 800 AD, Pope Leo III placed a crown on the head of the Frankish king Charles in St. Peter&amp;rsquo;s Basilica in Rome and the assembled congregation acclaimed him Emperor of the Romans. Whether Charlemagne was surprised by this — his biographer Einhard claims he said he would not have entered the church had he known what was to happen — is debated; the staging suggests coordination, and Charlemagne was not a man who was often genuinely surprised by political events. What is not debated is what the coronation meant: four centuries after the conventional date of Rome&amp;rsquo;s fall, the most powerful ruler in western Europe was being crowned not as King of the Franks or King of the Germans but as Emperor of the Romans, in Rome, at the greatest shrine of Roman Christianity, by the successor of St. Peter. Rome had not died. It had changed form.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Contemporary Artists and Ancient Rome: The Ruin That Won&#39;t Stay Ruined</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/contemporary-artists-and-ancient-rome-the-ruin-that-wont-stay-ruined/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/contemporary-artists-and-ancient-rome-the-ruin-that-wont-stay-ruined/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ancient Rome has not left contemporary art alone, and contemporary art has not left ancient Rome alone. The relationship between them is different from the academic tradition&amp;rsquo;s engagement — less archaeologically earnest, more ironic, more interested in the tension between the ruin and its meanings than in the reconstruction of what the ruin was before it ruined. Contemporary artists approaching Rome approach a subject already saturated with prior appropriations: the neoclassical, the Victorian, the fascist, the cinematic. To paint or photograph or install Rome now is to navigate a layered history of representations that is itself part of the subject.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edward Poynter and the Romans of the Decadence</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/edward-poynter-and-the-romans-of-the-decadence/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/edward-poynter-and-the-romans-of-the-decadence/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Edward Poynter&amp;rsquo;s Cave of the Storm Nymphs, his Israel in Egypt, and his Lesbia, along with the Roman paintings of his contemporaries John William Waterhouse and Edward John Poynter, belong to a specific Victorian sub-genre that might be called moral archaeology: the use of meticulously researched ancient settings to explore contemporary anxieties about gender, sexuality, empire, and the relationship between civilization and decadence. These paintings are not straightforwardly about Rome or Egypt or Greece. They are about Victorian England, using the distance of antiquity as a frame that permitted the examination of subjects that contemporaneity made difficult.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Latin: The Language That Refused to Die</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/latin-the-language-that-refused-to-die/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/latin-the-language-that-refused-to-die/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Latin is not a dead language. The claim that it died with Rome is one of the more misleading things said about either Latin or Rome, and correcting it requires understanding what actually happened to the language after the Western Empire&amp;rsquo;s political structures dissolved in the fifth century. Latin did not die. It evolved, as all living languages do, into forms that its classical speakers would have had difficulty understanding. The languages that evolved from it — Italian, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Romanian, Catalan, Galician, Occitan, and several others — are Latin, in the same sense that modern English is Old English: substantially transformed, but continuous. They did not replace Latin; they are Latin, moving through time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Piranesi&#39;s Rome: Ruins as Sublime</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/piranesis-rome-ruins-as-sublime/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/piranesis-rome-ruins-as-sublime/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Giovanni Battista Piranesi arrived in Rome in 1740 at the age of twenty and spent the rest of his life there, producing approximately one thousand etchings of the ancient and modern city that changed how Europeans understood ruins and, through ruins, understood time. His Vedute di Roma — the Views of Rome — documented the ancient monuments with a precision that made them available to architects, scholars, and artists across Europe who could not travel to see the originals. His Carceri d&amp;rsquo;Invenzione — the Imaginary Prisons — invented spaces of impossible scale and mechanical complexity that influenced the visual imagination of the Gothic tradition, science fiction, and everything in between. His archaeological publications — the Antichità Romane — were serious scholarly contributions to the understanding of Roman building techniques. He was simultaneously a documentarian, a fantasist, and a polemicist, and the three modes were not always separable.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Roman Law in the Modern World</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/roman-law-in-the-modern-world/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/roman-law-in-the-modern-world/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;More than half the world&amp;rsquo;s population lives under legal systems derived substantially from Roman law. This is not a figure of speech or a vague cultural influence — it is a specific claim about the transmission of particular legal concepts, doctrines, and analytical frameworks from the Roman jurists of the classical period through Justinian&amp;rsquo;s sixth-century compilation, through the medieval universities where that compilation was taught, and through the national codifications of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that carry Roman legal doctrine in modified form to the present day. The French Civil Code of 1804, the German Civil Code of 1900, the Italian Civil Code of 1942, the Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Belgian, Swiss, Japanese, Korean, Brazilian, and hundreds of other civil law codes: all of these are Roman law filtered through historical transmission and adapted to modern conditions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Romulus, Remus, and the She-Wolf: How Rome Invented Its Own Origin</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/romulus-remus-and-the-she-wolf-how-rome-invented-its-own-origin/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/romulus-remus-and-the-she-wolf-how-rome-invented-its-own-origin/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;At Millesgården, the sculptor Carl Milles&amp;rsquo;s studio and museum on the island of Lidingö outside Stockholm, a copy of the Capitoline Wolf stands in the open air, green with patina, the two infants nursing beneath the she-wolf&amp;rsquo;s belly on a red granite plinth. Ivy climbs the wall behind it. A stone face — a garden ornament — watches from the wall above. The composition is so familiar as to have become almost invisible through repetition: the wolf alert, ears pricked, facing left with a wariness that has not relaxed in two thousand years of bronze casting; the twins below, pudgy and insistent, entirely unconcerned with the predator feeding them. The image is Rome&amp;rsquo;s founding symbol, its most exported icon, the picture that appeared on Roman coins in the second century BC and on Italian government documents in the twenty-first century AD. It has been in continuous circulation as a symbol of Roman identity for over two millennia, which is not an achievement many images can claim.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Arch: How Rome Built Forever</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/the-arch-how-rome-built-forever/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/the-arch-how-rome-built-forever/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The arch is not a Roman invention. The Babylonians built arches. The Egyptians built arches. The Etruscans used the arch centuries before Rome became a significant power. What Rome did with the arch was different in kind from what any previous civilization had achieved: it deployed the arch at a scale and consistency that transformed the built environment of three continents, in forms — the vault, the barrel vault, the groin vault, the dome — that enabled the massive public spaces that define Roman architecture, and it left behind enough surviving examples that the arch became synonymous with Rome in the European architectural imagination.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Barbarian Kingdoms: Rome Without Rome</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/the-barbarian-kingdoms-rome-without-rome/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/the-barbarian-kingdoms-rome-without-rome/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The kingdoms that replaced Roman administration in the western provinces were not anti-Roman. This is the most important correction to the standard narrative of Rome&amp;rsquo;s fall, and it matters because the standard narrative — civilized Rome overwhelmed by barbarous outsiders — is both factually wrong and interpretively misleading. The Visigothic kingdom in Spain, the Ostrogothic kingdom in Italy, the Burgundian kingdom in the Rhône valley, the Frankish kingdom in Gaul — these were not negations of Rome. They were, in varying degrees, continuations of Rome under different management, sustained by Roman administrative forms, legitimated by Roman imperial titles, and often governed by rulers who had spent significant portions of their careers in Roman service and who regarded Roman civilization as the culture they had inherited rather than the culture they had defeated.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Roman Template: How Ancient Rome Shaped English Historical Fiction</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/the-roman-template-how-ancient-rome-shaped-english-historical-fiction/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/the-roman-template-how-ancient-rome-shaped-english-historical-fiction/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The tradition of serious English historical fiction about Rome begins, in its modern form, with Edward Bulwer-Lytton&amp;rsquo;s The Last Days of Pompeii in 1834 — a novel that invented the sub-genre of Roman disaster narrative, established the template of the virtuous Christian and the corrupt pagan Roman, and sold in numbers that established ancient Rome as a commercially viable fictional setting for the Victorian reading public. The novel is not much read today and deserves to be read less. Its historical importance is entirely distinct from its literary quality.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Triumph of Rome: Ancient Victories Painted for Modern Empires</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/the-triumph-of-rome-ancient-victories-painted-for-modern-empires/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/the-triumph-of-rome-ancient-victories-painted-for-modern-empires/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Roman triumph — the procession through the city in which a victorious general displayed his captives and the spoils of conquest before depositing the latter in the treasury and offering thanks at the temple of Jupiter Capitolinus — was the most spectacular public ritual of the Roman world, and its visual representation has served as propaganda for European rulers from the Renaissance through the nineteenth century. The triumph&amp;rsquo;s logic — the hero returns, the enemy is displayed, the city is made to feel the extent of its power — was available for appropriation by any ruler who needed to communicate the same things, and the painters who rendered ancient triumphs for modern patrons understood they were serving both historical documentation and political argument simultaneously.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
