<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Roman Television on Ancient Rome</title>
    <link>https://ancientrome.org/tags/roman-television/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Roman Television on Ancient Rome</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ancientrome.org/tags/roman-television/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Spartacus (2010–2013): The Show That Earned Its Excess</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/spartacus-20102013-the-show-that-earned-its-excess/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/spartacus-20102013-the-show-that-earned-its-excess/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Starz series Spartacus arrived in 2010 with a visual style so aggressively stylized — slow-motion combat, digitally saturated color, blood that moves through the air with the deliberate beauty of a special effect — that critics spent their first reviews debating whether it was art or exploitation before most of them had noticed what was actually happening in the story. What was happening was more interesting than the style wars suggested: a show about Roman slavery that took the institution seriously, a gladiatorial drama that understood what the arena was and what it cost, and a protagonist whose journey from Thracian warrior to rebel general was built on genuine dramatic logic rather than franchise mechanics.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spartacus: Blood and Sand — History as Exploitation</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/spartacus-blood-and-sand-history-as-exploitation/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/spartacus-blood-and-sand-history-as-exploitation/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Starz series Spartacus: Blood and Sand, which premiered in 2010 and ran for three seasons plus a prequel miniseries, was not trying to be HBO&amp;rsquo;s Rome. It was trying to be 300 with a continuing narrative, and within those self-defined limits it largely succeeded. The historical record of the Third Servile War provided the scaffolding; everything else was constructed from the materials of a production that prioritized stylized violence, explicit sexuality, and operatic emotion over archaeological fidelity. The question is whether that constitutes a failure, and the answer depends on what you expected the show to be.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HBO&#39;s Rome: The Show That Got Too Much Right</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/hbos-rome-the-show-that-got-too-much-right/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/hbos-rome-the-show-that-got-too-much-right/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;HBO&amp;rsquo;s Rome ran for two seasons from 2005 to 2007, cost approximately one hundred million dollars to produce, was cancelled before completing its intended narrative arc, and remains the most historically serious attempt to dramatize the late Roman Republic for a mass audience that has yet been made. Its cancellation, attributed to production costs after a fire destroyed the primary sets, was a genuine cultural loss. The show was not perfect. It was better than anything else in its field by a margin that makes comparison almost unfair.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I, Claudius: The Greatest Roman Television Ever Made</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/i-claudius-the-greatest-roman-television-ever-made/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/i-claudius-the-greatest-roman-television-ever-made/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I, Claudius was broadcast by the BBC in 1976, produced on a budget that would not cover the catering costs of a modern prestige television production, shot almost entirely on interior sets that made no pretense of representing ancient Rome, and it is the finest dramatization of Roman history ever made. The production design is limited. The performances are not. Robert Graves&amp;rsquo;s source novels provided a narrative that understood the Julio-Claudian dynasty as a political tragedy of Shakespearean scope, and the BBC production found the cast to realize it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spartacus: House of Ashur (2025) — The Souvenir That Should Not Exist</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/spartacus-house-of-ashur-2025-the-souvenir-that-should-not-exist/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/spartacus-house-of-ashur-2025-the-souvenir-that-should-not-exist/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There is a specific category of object that exists in every tourist market in the world: the miniature Eiffel Tower, made in China, sold in Paris, possessing the shape of the original without any of its substance. It is recognizable as the thing it represents. It is not the thing. Spartacus: House of Ashur, which premiered on Starz in December 2025, is that object. It has the visual vocabulary of the original series — the slow-motion combat, the stylized blood, the ludus architecture, the Roman costumes — and it has none of what made the original worth watching. Recognizable. Not the thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
