<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Slavery on Ancient Rome</title>
    <link>https://ancientrome.org/tags/slavery/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Slavery on Ancient Rome</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ancientrome.org/tags/slavery/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>A Freed Slave in Augustan Rome Paid to Have His Wrinkles Carved in Marble</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/a-freed-slave-in-augustan-rome-paid-to-have-his-wrinkles-carved-in-marble/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/a-freed-slave-in-augustan-rome-paid-to-have-his-wrinkles-carved-in-marble/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The piece is small, about nine and a half inches high, and it is obviously a fragment. A man&amp;rsquo;s head and shoulders, carved in marble in the late first century BCE, broken out of something considerably larger. The Met&amp;rsquo;s curators identify what that something was: a funerary relief, the kind set into the outside wall of a family tomb, and they think the man was almost certainly a freedman.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;His face is not flattered. The flesh sits heavy around the mouth, the brow is creased, the whole head has the blunt hard-worn quality that art historians call verism. He paid for that. Somebody in Rome, a generation or two out of slavery, commissioned a portrait and specifically did not ask to be made handsome.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spartacus (2010–2013): The Show That Earned Its Excess</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/spartacus-20102013-the-show-that-earned-its-excess/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/spartacus-20102013-the-show-that-earned-its-excess/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Starz series Spartacus arrived in 2010 with a visual style so aggressively stylized — slow-motion combat, digitally saturated color, blood that moves through the air with the deliberate beauty of a special effect — that critics spent their first reviews debating whether it was art or exploitation before most of them had noticed what was actually happening in the story. What was happening was more interesting than the style wars suggested: a show about Roman slavery that took the institution seriously, a gladiatorial drama that understood what the arena was and what it cost, and a protagonist whose journey from Thracian warrior to rebel general was built on genuine dramatic logic rather than franchise mechanics.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spartacus: Blood and Sand — History as Exploitation</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/spartacus-blood-and-sand-history-as-exploitation/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/spartacus-blood-and-sand-history-as-exploitation/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Starz series Spartacus: Blood and Sand, which premiered in 2010 and ran for three seasons plus a prequel miniseries, was not trying to be HBO&amp;rsquo;s Rome. It was trying to be 300 with a continuing narrative, and within those self-defined limits it largely succeeded. The historical record of the Third Servile War provided the scaffolding; everything else was constructed from the materials of a production that prioritized stylized violence, explicit sexuality, and operatic emotion over archaeological fidelity. The question is whether that constitutes a failure, and the answer depends on what you expected the show to be.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Roman Agriculture: The Engine of Empire</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/roman-agriculture-the-engine-of-empire/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/roman-agriculture-the-engine-of-empire/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ninety percent of the people in the Roman Empire worked the land. This is the number that most discussions of Rome skip past in their attention to the legions and the Colosseum and the philosophical schools, but it is the number that actually determined the empire&amp;rsquo;s possibilities. Everything else — the armies, the cities, the building programs, the literary culture — was built on the agricultural surplus generated by the rural majority that never appears in the histories because it was not writing them. Roman civilization was an agricultural civilization with sophisticated urban superstructure, and understanding the agriculture is understanding the base on which everything else rested.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Roman Punishment: Law in Action</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/roman-punishment-law-in-action/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/roman-punishment-law-in-action/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Roman punishment was not uniform. It was calibrated to social status in ways so explicit and systematic that the law itself divided humanity into categories that determined not merely the severity of punishment but its entire character. The honestiores — the honorable ones, comprising senators, equestrians, veterans, and local elites — faced one set of penalties for any given crime. The humiliores — the lower orders — faced another, typically harsher, more physically degrading, and more public. This was not a failure of Roman justice to live up to an egalitarian ideal. It was Roman justice operating precisely as designed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Roman Tort Law: When Romans Wronged Each Other</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/roman-tort-law-when-romans-wronged-each-other/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/roman-tort-law-when-romans-wronged-each-other/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Roman law recognized that people harmed each other in ways that were not crimes but that required legal remedy, and it organized those harms into a category called delict — from delinquere, to fail or offend — that is the ancestor of what common law systems call tort. The Roman law of delict was not a unified system imposed from above but a collection of specific wrongs that had accumulated through centuries of legal development, each with its own history, elements, and remedies, organized into a coherent framework by the juristic tradition that had the intellectual ambition to see the categories whole. What the jurists built was not only practically useful to Romans seeking legal remedies but was the foundation of civil liability doctrine in legal systems that still operate today.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Slavery Was the Roman Economy</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/slavery-was-the-roman-economy/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/slavery-was-the-roman-economy/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Greek and Roman antiquities hall of the Louvre, in a room of vaulted ceilings and warm museum light, four marble figures stand back-to-back around a central pillar and refuse to let you walk past without stopping. The group is known as the Four Captives — a Roman work, probably inspired by Hellenistic precedents, likely once decorating a monumental structure whose specific identity is lost. What survives is the message, and the message is not subtle.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spartacus: The Slave Who Terrified Rome</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/spartacus-the-slave-who-terrified-rome/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/spartacus-the-slave-who-terrified-rome/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Denis Foyatier carved this Spartacus in 1830 and put him in the Louvre&amp;rsquo;s Cour Puget, where he has stood ever since in a room of arched windows and pale stone, looking out over the other sculptures with an expression that is not quite triumph and not quite grief. The arms are crossed over his chest. The body is athletic, coiled without being in motion. A broken chain dangles from his wrist — the moment of liberation captured in marble, though Foyatier was careful not to make the moment simple. The face is the point: this is not a victor. This is a man who has just broken free and is now confronting what that means, which turns out to be a harder problem than the breaking.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Romans Wore and What It Meant</title>
      <link>https://ancientrome.org/what-romans-wore-and-what-it-meant/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ancientrome.org/what-romans-wore-and-what-it-meant/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Roman clothing was a system of social communication before it was a system of warmth or modesty. What a Roman wore told every observer who saw them something specific about their legal status, their social rank, their occupation, their marital status, and the occasion they were attending. The reading of clothing was automatic and precise in a society that had neither name tags nor business cards and that organized its social interactions around the rapid assessment of social position. Dress was not merely decorative; it was informational, and the information it carried was regulated by law and custom with a specificity that modern dress codes do not approach.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
